The Toronto Star today produced an editorial that judges the Liberal plan for cities to be the best of the bunch.
Unfortunately, the logic they use to come to that conclusion is a bit suspect.
The Star describes each of the parties, and tosses out the Conservatives for not having a plan at all. Fair enough.
However, here is how the Star describes -- and dismisses -- the NDP's plan:
Shorter TorStar: The NDP has a plan that is better for cities than the Liberals', however they're not going to win so they don't count.
That sort of argument certainly defeats the whole purpose of writing an editorial about any particular plan or policy point, doesn't it?